The study is published in the journal Nature, the British recovered from the unusual to see heavy rain in some areas more than 1 month’s decline in rainfall in the space of several hours. Dr. Peter Toth, climate scientist at the University of Reading and co-author of the paper, said: “This document is understandable, there are a large number of human activities affect global rainfall patterns, including increased precipitation in the north of 50 degrees north latitude, In this area, including the United Kingdom.

“The wet winter in the United Kingdom is expected that this will lead to more extreme precipitation, while summer is expected to be drier. But it may be based on climate change, there will be increased, even in extreme precipitation generally dry.” Recent events related to abnormal Weather conditions, with tropical ocean. The biggest problem in the UK is a great uncertainty about what will happen in the future of extreme rainfall. ”

Dr. Francis Zwiers of the Canadian Climate Center model in Toronto, and his colleagues compared records of global rainfall between 1925 and 1999, a global network of climate history, focusing on the 40 degrees north latitude and between the south and the north of 70 degrees . They pointed out that the focus of the precipitation forecast different climate models – some involving only natural trends and others, taking into account the impact of human activities on climate change.

These models, including the impact of human activities proposed by the heavy rains in the northern hemisphere mid-latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere in the deep sea in tropical and subtropical and lower rainfall in the tropical and sub-tropical Northern Hemisphere. When the researchers analyzed the historical record, they found more accurate. Global warming is likely to lead to more rainfall because of the higher atmospheric pressure to improve their water vapor.

Boshialun Myers, climate dynamics group at Oxford University, said: “This is a very important document.” We now know that the external drive as volcanic eruptions affect large-scale precipitation, but for the first time this paper fingerprint of human Impact. This means that the precipitation trends, they may indicate the future to find out more. ”

Dr. Huntingford, of the Center for Ecology and Hydrology, said: “It has been confirmed that the burning of fossil fuels have to change the pattern of rainfall at the global level. Here, we have to understand how they found a significant adjustment into the local changes in extreme precipitation events.

“And after that, we have a project in the future, how to carbon dioxide emissions could lead to further changes in local rainfall. This is a very regional rainfall is expected to be very important to help governments prepare for the possibility of some Circumstances, is a dangerous climate change. “

Increasing temperature of Earth has has put poles for the first time directly attributable to human activities, according to a study. The work, by an international team, is published in the journal Nature Geoscience. In 2007, the UN body on climate change presented strong evidence that the global average temperature increase is largely due to human activities. That contradicts the idea that this was a result of natural processes, such as an increase in intensity on sun.

At the time, there was sufficient evidence to say this for sure about the Arctic and Antarctic.
We really can not continue to pretend that it is natural that guides these variations to such big changes. Now this gap in research was connected, according to scientists who have made a detailed analysis of changes in temperature at both poles. The study indicates that humans have contributed to global warming in both regions. Researchers result was expected in the Arctic – a result of the recent sharp increase in melting of sea ice in summer in the region – but the  temperature changes in Antarctica have been so far difficult to interpret.

Today study, according to the researchers, suggests for the first time there is a discernable human influence on both the Arctic and Antarctica.
The research team took the temperature changes over Earth’s polar regions and compared with two sets of climate models.
A series assumes that there were no human influenza set the other was taken there. The best fit was with models that assumption that human activity including burning of fossil fuels and ozone depletion has played a role. According to one of the researchers involved in the study, Peter Stott, head of climate and monitoring for the award Met Office, formally showing that the Antarctic has been influenced by human activity was the main development:

In recent IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report, for example, he said, “unable to make a statement on the Antarctic, because this was not done a study at that time.
“But yet, when you do that you can clearly see a fingerprint found in humans. We really can not claim more than is natural that guides these variations are very big changes that we are seeing in our climate system.”
Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, said: “Our study is certainly close some loopholes in the latest report by the IPCC.
“But I still think a number of people, including some politicians are reluctant to accept the evidence or do nothing until they refused to say specifically that a particular event was caused by humans as a serious flood or somewhere even a heatwave.
“Until you go to small events in time and space, there will be people who still doubt the evidence.”