<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Warming Effects &#187; Greenhouse Gas Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/tag/greenhouse-gas-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com</link>
	<description>Global Warming Effects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama is prepared to help fighting Global Warming as a priority</title>
		<link>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/11/23/obama-is-prepared-to-help-fighting-global-warming-as-a-priority/</link>
		<comments>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/11/23/obama-is-prepared-to-help-fighting-global-warming-as-a-priority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driven Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming And Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Forefront]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising Sea Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tropical Forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Groups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaders of the state are looking forward to Obamas plans that global warming and climate change will be a national priority when considering to-do things. At a first-of-its-kind climate change meeting in Beverly Hills, international and state leaders said the problems that global warming present to the world are too big not to do everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaders of the state are looking forward to Obamas plans that global warming and climate change will be a national priority when considering to-do things.</p>
<p>At a first-of-its-kind climate change meeting in Beverly Hills, international and state leaders said the problems that global warming present to the world are too big not to do everything possible to address it.</p>
<p>&#8220;When you realize the kind of impact that climate change can have on a state like Florida, as any other &#8230; I think the people of our respective states expect us to at least try to make a difference,&#8221; Fla. Gov. Charlie Crist said last week at the conference hosted by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.</p>
<p>International climate help<br />
Rising sea levels and other global warming-related problems could devastate Florida and its tourist-driven economy, Crist said.</p>
<p>He and 12 other governors, as well as leaders from five other countries, signed a wide-reaching agreement Wednesday to work together on strategies to combat global warming.</p>
<p>Under the agreement, they also will create international working groups that will provide recommendations to United Nations negotiators who are drafting new global limits on greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Helping tropical forests<br />
In one step, Schwarzenegger and governors from Illinois and Wisconsin signed an agreement to work with six other governors from Brazil and Indonesia to share technology and other resources to help reduce clear-cutting of tropical forests. The agreement was billed as the first of its kind between sub-national government leaders.</p>
<p>Governors like Schwarzenegger and Crist, both Republicans, have been on the national forefront on climate change in recent years as the Bush administration&#8217;s approach to global warming was criticized as lackadaisical.</p>
<p>Under Crist&#8217;s leadership, Florida passed a comprehensive energy bill this year that calls for the state to get 10 percent of its fuels from alternative sources by next year and provides millions of dollars in grants and incentives to develop and promote solar and other types of renewable energy.</p>
<p>In California, Schwarzenegger is fighting the Bush administration to require automakers to meet more stringent emissions regulations. He also launched one of the biggest solar energy initiatives in the world. And last week, he signed an order requiring California to get a third of its energy from renewable power by 2020, increasing previous goals.</p>
<p>Prodding Bush<br />
Schwarzenegger and other governors began organizing the climate summit several years ago, partly to push the Bush administration and the next president to do more to address global warming.</p>
<p>Last week, they apparently got their wish.</p>
<p>In a videotaped address to conference attendees, Obama on Tuesday reiterated a campaign pledge to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050. The Bush administration in the past has declined to adhere to measurable emission limits, claiming that doing so would hurt the U.S. economy and give economic advantages to still-maturing countries like China and India.</p>
<p>Delay not an option<br />
Obama, however, made it clear he has a different view.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now is the time to confront this challenge once and for all,&#8221; he said in his remarks. &#8220;Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response. The stakes are too high, the consequences too serious.</p>
<p>&#8220;When I am president, any governor who is willing to promote clean energy will have a partner in the White House,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s remarks encouraged many at the conference.</p>
<p>&#8220;I do think this political issue is largely resolved with the election of &#8230; Obama,&#8221; said Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle. &#8220;And states that don&#8217;t get on this bandwagon are going to find they&#8217;re 15 to 20 years behind in the future.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/11/23/obama-is-prepared-to-help-fighting-global-warming-as-a-priority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Global Warming Effects mean an New World War</title>
		<link>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/11/10/global-warming-how-it-could-spark-world-war-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/11/10/global-warming-how-it-could-spark-world-war-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheshire Cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarette Smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Air Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicate Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leeway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longest Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollutant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting The Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War Iii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/47/global-warming-how-it-could-spark-world-war-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These Days global warming is a very hot topic and little wonder, seeing as the earth grows hotter with each passing year. For a long time now the effect of man&#8217;s industrialization and technological progress has quietly yet continuously eked away at the delicate balance of the planet&#8217;s atmosphere and ecosystem, but within the last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/cc/global_warming2.jpg"><img title="global warming" src="/wp-content/uploads/cc/global_warming2.jpg" alt="global warming" /></a></div>
<div>These Days global warming is a very hot topic and little wonder, seeing as the earth grows hotter with each passing year.</p>
<p>For a long time now the effect of man&#8217;s industrialization and technological progress has quietly yet continuously eked away at the delicate balance of the planet&#8217;s atmosphere and ecosystem, but within the last 30 or so years the pace of this damage has markedly accelerated!</p>
<p>DOWNPLAYING GLOBAL WARMING</p>
<p>In much the same way that big tobacco once vehemently denied the association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer, for the longest time a number of multi-billion-dollar-a-year industries have also been questioning the existence of global warming and misleading the public about its reality.</p>
<p>In fact the Bush II years have been particular devastating to Environmental Protection Rights, yet staggeringly lucrative for those who would profit from the loss of such protection.</p>
<p>In what can best be described as an orgy-fest of self-congratulatory backslapping, many a heavyweight lobbyist for industries such as oil, coal, mining, logging, aviation and auto manufacturers have left the Bush Whitehouse grinning like the proverbial Cheshire cat because they&#8217;d gotten firm assurance that pesky environmental laws would never get in the way of business as usual!</p>
<p>An example of how the Bush II Administration misled the public into believing they were truly concerned about protecting the environment was the sneaky way in which they enacted laws such as The Clean Skies Act.</p>
<p>The Clean Skies Act introduced in February 2003 apparently appears to strengthen already existent environmental laws such as The Clean Air Act but which in reality actually weakened and undermined them.</p>
<p>The Clean Skies Act gave pollutant industries a lot of leeway allowing them to spew an additional 42 million more tons of pollution into the atmosphere and raised caps on greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Soon after Bush II came to power the situation got so bad, that after decades of effective service, two of the most senior enforcement officials in the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) resigned citing an agency that was pursuing contrary goals to that of actually protecting the environment.</p>
<p>Former US vice president Al Gore is no stranger to these tactics. As perhaps the most widely recognizable face in the fight against global warming he has been scoffed at and ridiculed by the same individuals who would have us believe global warming is nothing more than a myth!</p>
<p>Recently in 2007 several scientists have gone on public record citing claims of a gestapo-like environment of intimidation to produce figures and reports that belied the true extent of global warming!</p>
<p>CAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING</p>
<p>The unprecedented super-accelerated rate of global warming happening today is due to the amount of greenhouse gases being spewed into the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The most notorious greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide (CO2) because it so happens to be the biggest single contributing factor to global warming (CO2 comprises more than 75% of all greenhouse gases). So what&#8217;s spewing all that CO2 in the air? Simply put&#8211;mankind and his toys!</p>
<p>Some of the biggest greenhouse gas pollutants include automobiles; electricity production; planes; shipping and the various manufacturing industries dotted all over the globe.</p>
<p>SCIENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING</p>
<p>This article is intentionally not an in-depth treatise of the process of global warming, but having said that, here&#8217;s a brief explanation:</p>
<p>The rays from the sun are comprised of shortwave solar radiation which pass through the atmosphere and are then absorbed by the earth thereby warming it. Part of that absorbed energy is reflected back to the atmosphere as long wave infrared radiation which is mostly trapped by the greenhouse gases. This trapped heat ensures that the earth is approximately warmer by 33 degrees Celsius than it would otherwise be.</p>
<p>This trapped heat is actually good for us, for were it not for those greenhouse gases and other constituents in the atmosphere that trap heat, the earth would be as cold as Mars which has for all intents and purpose no atmosphere to speak of.</p>
<p>Over the past century the earth has gotten warmer by approximately 0.7 degrees Celsius. This may not seem like much until you consider that the difference between the average earth temperature of today and another ice age is a mere 5 degrees Celsius!</p>
<p>EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING</p>
<p>Drought! Flooding! Disease! Hurricanes! Starvation! Unbearable Heat!</p>
<p>Any of these words seem to you to be appearing much more often in the news than before?</p>
<p>Do you remember the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami that claimed more than 200,000 people? Remember hurricane Katrina that claimed more than 2,000 lives? These are the better documented horror stories. The less well documented global-warming related stories are often dismissively written off as ethnic conflicts in a region (Africa) where supposedly little else can be expected.</p>
<p>CATASTROPHIC ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CAUSED BY GLOBAL WARMING</p>
<p>1. Larsen B Ice Shelf: In 2002, a 500 billion ton chunk of ice that was 220m thick and covering a surface area of 3,250 sq km disintegrated in 35 days! What was especially alarming was that the experts expected this ice shelf to still be around for the next 100 years even after factoring in current global warming trends.</p>
<p>Yet more alarming still is that there&#8217;re two other MUCH, MUCH BIGGER ice masses that are exhibiting the same global warming related disintegration characteristics!</p>
<p>These endangered ice masses are Greenland and the West Antarctic Ice Shelf which was previously thought to be stable. Since these ice masses are land based (unlike the Larsen B Ice Shelf) if either one of them goes they could raise sea levels by 20ft apiece!</p>
<p>If both of them disintegrate around the same time, sea levels could rise by 40ft! Catastrophic does not adequately describe the ensuing destruction.</p>
<p>More than 66% of the world&#8217;s largest cities would be devastated if even just one of these ice masses disintegrated. Though many of the affected low-elevation costal areas are located in Asia, New York, Florida, San Francisco and The Netherlands are also on the list!</p>
<p>Perhaps this disturbing data may explain the belated, albeit grudging acknowledgement by the Bush II administration that global warming is not a myth after all and that it won&#8217;t just affect the poorer regions of the world. As things stand, experts are predicting that with current unmodified global warming trends Greenland may collapse as soon as 2050.</p>
<p>2. Lake Chad: Lake Chad used to be the 6th largest lake in the world but due to global warming has shrunk to 1/20th of its former size. In fact Chad the country for which it is named after is now more than 60 miles from the water&#8217;s edge!</p>
<p>3. New Ice Age: The northern hemisphere of the world is located above the equator and constitutes most of the world&#8217;s land mass as well as almost 90% of the world population.</p>
<p>Though current expert reports on global warming imply that the northern hemisphere will initially actually benefit from the temperature increase (unlike the southern hemisphere where unprecedented drought and starvation is predicted by 2020) what is little mentioned is how global warming could usher in a new Ice Age!</p>
<p>Some paradox, huh? Warming leading to freezing! Here&#8217;s a simplified explanation of how that comes about:</p>
<p>The Gulf Stream current is one of several currents that occur in the Atlantic Ocean. The particular importance of the Gulf Stream Current and its northern extension (the North Atlantic Drift which flows towards Europe) is that their warm-water flow heats up the surrounding air which in turn ensures that the temperature of the northern hemispheres does not dip precipitously.</p>
<p>These two currents are saline (salt) based. If a huge mass of fresh water (such as a melting body of ice the size of Greenland) was to dilute these currents, in effect that would shut down the Gulf Stream Current!</p>
<p>Once the Gulf Stream Current shuts down temperatures are going to drop precariously in the United States, Europe and other nations located in the northern hemisphere. When that happens those regions will deep-freeze into another Ice Age!</p>
<p>GLOBAL WARMING AND THE CO2 WARS</p>
<p>The following figures illustrate the CO2 emissions from the various regions around the globe:</p>
<p>USA: 30.3%</p>
<p>Europe: 27.7%</p>
<p>Russia: 13.7%</p>
<p>South East Asia: 12.2%</p>
<p>Japan: 3.7%</p>
<p>South America/Central America: 3.8%</p>
<p>Middle East: 2.6%</p>
<p>Africa: 2.5%</p>
<p>Australia: 1.1%</p>
<p>These figures amply illustrate how Western Europe and the United States are by far largely responsible for the effects of global warming we are seeing today.</p>
<p>Contrastingly the regions least responsible are the ones that will bear the brunt of those effects (initially at any rate, until such time that the process progresses to an ice age then the situation will reverse).</p>
<p>However, with the two mega economies of China and India expanding rapidly (each boasting a population in excess of 1 billion) soon their greenhouse gas emissions may surpass those of the U.S.</p>
<p>A series of meetings held in Washington in early 2007 had American legislators demanding that developing nations be held to the same greenhouse-gas-emission accountability as the developed nations! Not unexpectedly there were worldwide outcries and accusations of shameless hypocrisy leveled at the United States.</p>
<p>With the not unreasonable contention that they have the right to develop and advance in the same manner that both Europe and America have enjoyed over the past forty years these two looming economical giants are not about to be cowed by Washington.</p>
<p>Furthermore considering the suspicious manner with which the U.S. justified its invasion of Iraq, few these days are inclined to believe a word that Washington says.</p>
<p>Compounding this climate of distrust and suspicion are the many questionable prerogatives the U.S. claims. These include:</p>
<p>1. Not subscribing to the Kyoto Protocol (Treaty on Global Warming)</p>
<p>2. Seeking the right to pre-emptive strikes (Bush II)</p>
<p>3. Demanding to be exempted from The Geneva Convention (Bush II)</p>
<p>4. Not a participant of the World Court</p>
<p>5. Biggest contributor to global warming but doing the least to rectify the situation.</p>
<p>In a world where America demands exclusive rights to pre-emptive strikes, perhaps then it is not too far fetched to understand if India and China harbor a degree of paranoia that the U.S. may one day set its targets on them.</p>
<p>After all for a country that so conveniently and magically connected two totally unrelated events to one another as an excuse to pursue its ultimate goal (U.S. invasion of Iraq after 911), it is not unconceivable that the U.S. could one day claim that the greenhouse gas emissions from the Asian giants are threatening the very existence of its coastal cities and hence amount to an act of war!</p>
<p>For their part the Asian giants already suspiciously view Washington&#8217;s demands concerning greenhouse gases as a thinly veiled attempt to restrict their economical development.</p>
<p>That said, China and India are hardly Iraq! These are two countries which both boast formidable nuclear arsenals that are quite capable of reaching the U.S. Besides if the U.S. were to take any drastic action it is unlikely that the slumbering Russian bear would continue dozing for much longer.</p>
<p>World wars have erupted over much less and in the heated climate of today it only takes one more little spark to set everything off!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/11/10/global-warming-how-it-could-spark-world-war-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the term Global Warming mean?</title>
		<link>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/10/24/what-does-the-term-global-warming-means/</link>
		<comments>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/10/24/what-does-the-term-global-warming-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric Greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Sensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disease Vectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects Of Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Framework Convention On Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Concentrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change Ipcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Phenomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orbit Around The Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Species Extinctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Term Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/?p=2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global warming refers to the increase in the average temperature of the Earth&#8217;s near-surface air and oceans in recent decades and its projected continuation. The global average air temperature near the Earth&#8217;s surface rose 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during the last 100 years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Global warming</strong> refers to the increase in the average temperature of the Earth&#8217;s near-surface air and oceans in recent decades and its projected continuation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>global average air temperature</strong> near the Earth&#8217;s surface rose 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during the last 100 years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes, &#8220;most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations via the <a href="http://www.effectofglobalwarming.com/" target="_blank">greenhouse effect.</a> Natural phenomena such as solar variation combined with volcanoes probably had a small warming effect from pre-industrial times to 1950 and a small cooling effect from 1950 onward.<sup> </sup>The range of values results from the use of differing scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions as well as models with differing climate sensitivity. An increase in global temperatures is expected to cause the sea level to rise, increase the intensity of extreme weather events, and change the amount and pattern of precipitation. <a href="http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/12/some-global-warming-facts-of-effects/" target="_self">Other effects of global warming</a> include changes in agricultural yields, glacier retreat, species extinctions and increases in the ranges of disease vectors.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Most national governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol, aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The term &#8220;<strong>global warming</strong>&#8221; is a specific example of the broader term climate change, which can also refer to global cooling.  The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) uses the term &#8220;climate change&#8221; for human-caused change, and &#8220;climate variability&#8221; for other changes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Earth&#8217;s climate changes in response to external forcing, including variations in its orbit around the sun (orbital forcing), volcanic eruptions, and atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. The detailed causes of the recent warming remain an active field of research, but the scientific consensus identifies elevated levels of greenhouse gases due to human activity as the main influence. In contrast to the scientific consensus that recent warming is mainly attributable to elevated levels of greenhouse gases, other hypotheses have been suggested to explain the observed increase in mean global temperature. Climate commitment studies indicate that even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Greenhouse process is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by atmospheric gases <span> </span>warms a planet&#8217;s atmosphere and surface.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Naturally occurring greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F), without which Earth would be uninhabitable. Some other naturally occurring gases contribute very small fractions of the greenhouse effect; one of these, nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), is increasing in concentration owing to human activity such as agriculture. The atmospheric concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> and methane have increased by 31% and 149% respectively above pre-industrial levels since 1750.  Future CO<sub>2</sub> levels are expected to rise due to ongoing burning of fossil fuels and land-use change.  Fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to reach this level and continue emissions past 2100, if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newglobalwarmingeffects.com/2008/10/24/what-does-the-term-global-warming-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

